The material on our Website is for general information only, it is current as at the stated date of publication, but does not constitute legal advice. You must take appropriate professional advice before taking or refraining from action based on any material on our Website. Gherson accepts no liability whatsoever for any reliance upon the contents of this Website. Whilst you may access other websites from our Website, and our Website may refer to other websites, Gherson accepts no liability in connection with any other website.
Substantial culpable delay rendered extradition oppressive and disproportionate On 5 January 2016, in the first published extradition judgment from the Administrative Court of the New Year ( Valdas Geleziunas v Lithuania [2016] EWHC 16 (Admin)), Mr Justice Sweeney overturned a decision of District Judge Purdy to extradite Valdas Geleziunas to Lithuania in connection with an allegation of dishonestly obtaining scaffolding equipment worth approximately £8,000. The allegation dated... Read more »
Do Adult "Children" have Rights to Family Life under Article 8? A recent decision of the Upper Tribunal considered this question in the case of Singh and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department (SSHD) [2015] ECWA Civ 630. Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) provides for the right to respect for private and family life. The case concerned two adult brothers from India (aged 24 and 26) who had been refused indefinite leave to remain in the UK. Their... Read more »
A summary of the Supreme Court ruling in Secretary of State for the Home Department v Al Jedda [2013] UKSC 62 A person who is deemed stateless is severely restricted from pursuing a normal life. As a consequence, a number of basic rights are lost, from the ability to rely on diplomatic assistance to having no home country with an automatic right to return . Is making such an order ever justified on the grounds that it is conducive to the public good? This question was addressed in the recent... Read more »
We recently took over a case in which our client and his dependent spouse were refused leave to remain in the United Kingdom as a Tier 2 (General) migrant and a relevant PBS Dependant. Our client had previously been in the UK as a Work Permit holder. Because of the introduction of the Points based system and Sponsorship licenses, our client's employer were not aware until our client's leave to remain was due to expire, that they would need a license in order to continue employing him. ... Read more »
A recent case from the High Court has held that the introduction of the requirement for a British citizen to earn £18,600 per year in order to qualify to bring their family member to the UK is an unjustified and disproportionate interference with the ability of spouses to live together and contrary to Article 8 of the ECHR . Subsequent to the determination being issued the Home Office has announced it will suspend making decisions on applications where the financial requirements... Read more »
Home Secretary Theresa May has accused judges of making the UK more dangerous by ignoring rules aimed at deporting more foreign criminals. Last year, MPs approved new guidance for judges making clear a criminal's right to a family life had limits. The guidance made clear the right to a family life - set out in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights - was only qualified. The change was designed to end a string of cases where it was used to justify granting foreign criminals... Read more »
In late March 2012 Gherson represented a citizen of Tanzania in a successful appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) against the entry clearance officer (ECO), Nairobi. The appellant was an elderly lady whose original appeal against the decision of the ECO to refuse her and her brother’s leave to enter as dependent relatives of their nephew (their brother’s son) was heard in the First-tier Tribunal (the ‘FTT’). Her brother’s appeal was allowed by the... Read more »
In January 2012 Gherson represented a citizen of the Russian Federation in a successful appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) against the Entry Clearance Officer (ECO), Moscow. The appellant had appealed against the decision of the ECO to refuse her a visa to visit the UK in February 2011. There had been a mandatory refusal by the ECO under paragraph 320(7A) of the Immigration Rules which applies where false representations have been made or material facts... Read more »
We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience of our website. By continuing to use this website you agree to this use of cookies. You can, however, change the cookie settings in your browser at any time. Further details of our cookie policy can be found hereClose